https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPLaNRZ3ypE
When David Wood debated Mohammed Hijab, he brought up the anthropomorphic nature of the Muslim god Allah which can be found in the Quran but mostly in the Hadith. Mohammed Hijab didn’t know what do with it. He responded to a few things, misrepresented others, and dodged others. He was unaware that Muslims scholars had taught this as he asked Wood to provide Muslim scholars who believed this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPHs8Dp4V7M
When Mohammed Hijab had his debate with David Wood, he mentioned something interesting. He mentioned in his first rebuttal that in the New International Version, the I AM statements aren’t I AM but “I will be”. This is news to me. I own several copies of the NIV and I don’t find that. I only find I am.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqlP9XxluOo&t=1s
Anyone who has been following this website knows about my favorite argument that Muslims use in favor or Muhammad. I’m of course talking about Song of Solomon 5:16. This is the argument that states that there is a possible phonetic parallel between a Hebrew word and with Muhammad’s name. The context of Song of Solomon has absolutely nothing to do with this but let’s look beyond that for a moment.
The Crucifixion Of Our Lord Jesus Christ
I didn’t want to do a review of the debate between Adnan Rashid and Samuel Green on the crucifixion of Jesus Christ but this general overview will cover a lot of material in that debate. The crucifixion has always been a sticky point for Muslims. The Quran denies it but only in one place. There are multiple first century sources of the crucifixion of Jesus but Muslims go for the one mysterious statement in the Quran six centuries after the event.
Recently Muslim apologist Adnan Rashid debated Samuel Green on the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. My goal is not to review the debate but instead to point out an argument that the Muslims need to stop using for their own sake. They’ve been using this argument uncritically and I’m going to show why it has to be retired.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BseoeKreBKc
I’ve been talking about the Wood vs. Hijab debate for quite a while. The debate is certainly leaving its mark on social media. Basically everyone is talking about how Mohammed Hijab engaged in the straw man Olympics and was disrespectful to David Wood. Hijab was very open about this. He said that he was showing no respect to Wood because of the disrespect that Wood has shown to Islam.
St. Athanasius – Defender Of The Incarnation
I’ve noticed a new trend in Islamic apologetics. It’s clever, I’ll admit that. I believe it started with Adnan Rashid in a debate that he had with James White a few years ago. I could be wrong about that but regardless of the origins, it’s the argument that matters. This is applied to both the Scripture and the Church fathers. I want to deal with the Church fathers specifically.
In my previous two posts on Mohammed Hijab, I marveled in his impressive speaking skill. He’s one of the best speakers that I’ve ever seen. If I were to look at all of the Christian and Muslim apologists on the planet and find the best speaker among all of them, I would give it to Mohammed Hijab. This is what makes him dangerous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvB8alwJdYc
Trinity or Tawheed? A very important question. Recently David Wood and Mohammed Hijab debated this topic. In my last post, I briefly dealt with one of the key arguments of Mohammed Hijab. In this post, I will discuss the entire debate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrNMc0VTDUA&t=4579s
I recently watched the debate between David Wood and Mohammed Hijab about Trinity vs. Tawheed. A lot of arguments were raised by both sides but I want to deal with an argument that Mohammed Hijab presented. He presented a good argument and I believe it was a valid argument. Wood answered this but I don’t think his answer quite did the argument justice.