I suppose this idea could be entertained by any Islamic scholar or apologist when you think about it. Over the last several decades Islamic scholars and apologists have been reading not just our scriptures, but our Biblical scholarship. They’ve used this material to attack the Christian faith and try to prove Islamic doctrine. I actually have a suggestion that these Muslims might be interested in.
To a certain extent Muslims have an interest in what the Christian scriptures say. Although a Christian may read the Quran, we don’t have a theological dog in the fight since Muhammad is not a figure relating to our faith. A Muslim on the other hand believes that Jesus is a prophet sent by God and the New Testament is the earliest source for the life of Jesus.
Here’s what I suggest to my Muslims friends, apologists, and scholars. I would like to see a Muslim commentary on the New Testament. Now I know Muslims are busy and a commentary for the whole NT might be too much but why not one book? Perhaps the Gospel of Matthew? While most lay Muslims will just probably write the document off as corrupted, apologists and scholars believe that important truths remain in the pages of the NT.
Now, a Muslim commentary on the Gospel of Matthew might seem odd for these people because they believe that only certain parts are authentic. However, this can easily go in the commentary. Certain verses such at the last supper could be written off as later additions due to Quranic authority or certain liberal views of Biblical scholarship.
Now which book? I have been suggesting Matthew since it contains figures that the Muslims admire. Jesus, Mary, and the apostles, all of whom are Muslims according to their tradition. However any of the NT books would suffice. I know that the Muslims aren’t fond of the apostle Paul but they don’t need to make a commentary on one of his letters. However, there is no reason why they couldn’t pick Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, or even Acts. Mustafa Akyol in his book about Jesus has a great admiration for the book of James. Many options are available.
Now, I understand that Muslim scholars probably wouldn’t want to spend their time and probably years of research doing a commentary on a book that they don’t believe is inspired. Most Muslims don’t write commentaries on the Quran, why would they do one on a Biblical book that only contains partial truths? I’ll admit that this is a reasonable objection. Why waste precious time on this when we’re only given a finite amount of time? I concede that I don’t have an answer for this.
When Muslims quote the Bible to Christians, they only quote the parts where the text could possibly refute His deity or soteriology. I’d be interested in hearing what they think of all of His preaching on subjects like sin, obedience, faith, marriage and many other topics. Perhaps the money for the project could be crowd funded on Patreon? You’ve got to admit, it’s a clever idea.
A clever idea to make them read, study and investigate the teachings and texts of the New Testament indeed! And hopefully go down the same path as former skeptics & detractors like David Wood, Nabeel Qureshi, Josh McDowell, Lee Strobel, J Warner Wallace to name but a few!
Few things make me as annoyed as the idea of an Islamic Jesus. That is because there isn’t one.
First of all Islam talks about “Isa” whoever he may be? An Arabic reference to Jesus ought to be Yeshua – so who is this imposter?
Furthermore the Islamic imposter has very little to say on his own account. So why do Muslims claim to revere him when he has so little to say?
How come Islam agrees that Jesus was born of a virgin (Mohammed wasn’t) and that he was without sin (Mohammed wasn’t, that he performed miracles (Mohammed couldn’t) and was so special yet inferior to the warmongering, taker-of -women-captives that was called Mohammed.
I am really glad that Muslims revere Jesus – they need to know him better.
Hi Christopher,
They do need to know Him better. I think that when 99% of Muslims read the NT, they think “How can I get Islam out of this?”, so it may be hard to revere Jesus if that’s the case. It’s a Pauline document to them and Muslims today loathe St. Paul. Latias seems to be a rare exception.
In a way it’s liberating to us. When we read the Quran, we don’t have to torture it to conform to Christianity anymore than we have to do so with the book of Mormon. We can actually read the Quran and try to discover its original message, even when we don’t believe in the message. They cannot look at the NT like that.
God Bless,
Allan